Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Apr 2014 20:09 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces

There's certainly some hope on the horizon with Apple and Google, though just how good these systems will be remains to be seen. One thing is clear, though: the current state of all in-car experiences is incredibly bad. For those manufacturers looking to go it alone, I don't expect much.

In-car software is absolutely horrifying and crazy complex. A good friend of mine regularly drives brand new and super-expensive cars (in the hundreds of thousands of euros category), and even in those cars, the user interfaces are just terrible. There's a lot of room for improvement and disruption here.

Thread beginning with comment 586975
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by ilovebeer
by Hayoo! on Sat 12th Apr 2014 11:18 UTC in reply to "Comment by ilovebeer"
Hayoo!
Member since:
2013-04-13

Tech in cars is here to stay whether you like it or not.

Agreed. Especially considering that migrating to electric motors is inevitable; we'll have to abandon fossil fuel sooner or later.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer
by saso on Sat 12th Apr 2014 12:46 in reply to "RE: Comment by ilovebeer"
saso Member since:
2007-04-18

"Tech in cars is here to stay whether you like it or not.

Agreed. Especially considering that migrating to electric motors is inevitable; we'll have to abandon fossil fuel sooner or later.
"
No, we'll just have to stop using fossil fuels, which however does not necessarily mean abandoning the venerable ICB. Hydrocarbon fuels can be manufactured nowadays from a variety of sources, and have definite advantages to battery-electric cars:
1) They are extremely energy dense.
2) They are liquid at room temperature and ambient pressure.
3) All of the infrastructure for shipping, handling and selling them is already in place.
4) Consumers and society at large already knows how to deal with them in day-to-day life.
So don't underestimate hydrocarbon molecules' potential for being a very good store of energy. In fact, cars' gas tanks and BEVs' batteries are all essentially the same thing: chemical storage for energy. Except in one case, the energy comes out as heat and in the other as free electrons, either of which can be used to do work.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Sat 12th Apr 2014 15:15 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer Member since:
2011-08-08

New battery/energy storage and energy transmission technologies are developing quickly right now. That field is very active and there has been a number of breakthrough that could become game-changers. If so, I could easily see the production, shipment, storage, sale, consumer use of `gas` becoming obsolete in favor of electric.

However, we already know that technology, even when ready for mass-use, is often times shelved because oil & energy companies aren't finished squeezing every penny possible out of the old outdated stuff yet. Consumption is the name of the game and the more efficient things are, the less profit they see. Giving us the latest & greatest works against their business model therefore the latest & greatest gets shelved to collect dust.

Reply Parent Score: 3