Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd May 2014 18:21 UTC, submitted by Shane
General Development

I was at the OpenStack Summit this week. The overwhelming majority of OpenStack deployments are Linux-based, yet the most popular laptop vendor (by a long way) at the conference was Apple. People are writing code with the intention of deploying it on Linux, but they're doing so under an entirely different OS.

But what's really interesting is the tools they're using to do so. When I looked over people's shoulders, I saw terminals and a web browser. They're not using Macs because their development tools require them, they're using Macs because of what else they get - an aesthetically pleasing OS, iTunes and what's easily the best trackpad hardware/driver combination on the market. These are people who work on the same laptop that they use at home. They'll use it when they're commuting, either for playing videos or for getting a head start so they can leave early. They use an Apple because they don't want to use different hardware for work and pleasure.

Apple's laptops are still the best PCs money can buy at the moment (despite their horribly outdated displays). It's no wonder Linux developers, too, favour them.

Thread beginning with comment 589414
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Morgan
Member since:
2005-06-29

My last comment about who uses a Mac was ment to be a little tongue-in-cheek and I thought it would be taken humorously. But I wake up to find it was not. Next time, I will put a smiley next to it.


Sorry, I should have picked up on that. But the general theme of your post was more and more negative, and to end it with that kind of comment (as you said, without a "smiley") put the final nail in the coffin, so to speak.

So our experiment to switch to a Mac wasn´t succesful at all, among other things because installing inkscape on the Mac is a pain in the ass. First, you need XQuartz, then install X11, then install. Not fun, but once you have done that, the app does not feel as fast or as solid as it does on linux.


The great thing about XQuartz/X11 is that once they are installed, any future apps that depend on them are as easy to install as any native Mac app. If you are only installing them for one app, like Inkscape, I can understand the frustration. Personally, I always install X11 support and Xcode immediately after installing the OS on a Mac. Maybe that's why I never see it as an issue.

And the reason I want to emphasize this is because I have gotten tired of hearing the same line over the years: Mac OS is just another linux with a prettier interface and nicer multimedia apps: "you see, you have a terminal app on the Mac too".


I've always heard it as "Mac OS is UNIX/BSD with a nice GUI and commercial support". The few times someone has said to me that OS X is "just another Linux" I always correct them. Linux (the kernel) is very, very different from the various BSD kernels, to say nothing of the Mac OS Mach microkernel.

It is not. And I for one prefer Kmail to Mail, Amarok to iTunes any day of the year; or dolphin to the "finder"; or ktorrent to "transmission" (an open-source app that also runs on linux by the way) and the list goes and on. Not to mention the beautifully written educational apps from KDE's education suite that my two little kids use daily.


And I prefer OpenBox, Claws Mail, Clementine, Thunar, and RUTorrent to the items on your list. I don't just use a Mac; in fact, it's my least used machine. I do most of my work and play in Crunchbang Linux and Slackware Linux, with some Windows 7 for gaming and the Mac for music creation. That's the beauty of not tying oneself to a single platform. ;)

I realize that the Mac has its users and it uses, but I take offense to the generalization that Macs simply are better and that linux users such as myself will see the one shining light of truth any day now.


You won't hear me say "Macs are simply better". They are great at what they do, and they make excellent general purpose computers. But so do Windows machines, and so do GNU/Linux machines. I spend a lot of time (relatively speaking) on Haiku and BeOS, but you won't hear me say they are good production machines. I like what I like, and use the tool that works best. It's the same for everyone, I'm sure.

Notice I have focused on usability and never got into the economics of using a Mac vs a PC with Linux in terms of total cost of ownership because that is a thorny and completely different debate.


Indeed it is; I'm debating whether I should replace my aging Core Duo Mac mini at the end of this year. I'll have the money, but even as slow as my Mac is, for what I use it for, it's still adequate. And, if I get a Core i5 mini, I'll be tempted to put Windows 7 and Crunchbang on it and triple boot to consolidate all of my work and most of my recreation on it. Or, I could save $600 and just keep chugging along for another year on that old Mac, which reveals how much value you get when you buy one.

Reply Parent Score: 2