Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th May 2014 10:58 UTC, submitted by sb56637
Internet & Networking

The competition between Google and DuckDuckGo proved to be surprisingly fierce. In many respects the tiny DuckDuckGo holds its own against the giant that is Google, and even more so if the user is willing to slightly manipulate the search query to work around DuckDuckGo's temperamental intelligence layer. So it is heartening to see that DuckDuckGo is a viable alternative to Google by its own merits. But the elephant in the room here is Google's extensive tracking of user data. For that reason many users will staunchly avoid it on moral grounds, and for them the natural recourse is DuckDuckGo. Fortunately for them, it's a really great choice. In my case, privacy is not a primary concern. But having a top-notch search engine is. That's why I set DuckDuckGo as my browser's default search engine, and here's hoping it stays there for a long time.

I tried the 'new' DDG as well since it came out, setting it as my default search engine. Sadly, my experience wasn't as positive - it simply didn't find the things I was looking for about 80% of the time. Within a few days, I got into the habit of simply adding !g to every search query to go straight to Google anyway since that gave me the results I was looking for.

DDG's interface and presentation are far superior to Google's, but in the end, it's the results that matter, and not the coat of paint they're covered in. I do agree with the author's note about Google always - infuriatingly always - leading with YouTube video results on every damn query. So annoying.

Thread beginning with comment 589761
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Try this
by Drunkula on Thu 29th May 2014 13:07 UTC
Member since:

Can't you just add -youtube to your Google search queries?

Reply Score: 5

RE: Try this
by ddc_ on Fri 30th May 2014 00:10 in reply to "Try this"
ddc_ Member since:

Now this is really silly. Given that youtube is not the only site Google assigns improperly high weight to, the search query for making things workable would turn into monstrous abomination of couple of search terms ammended with multiple "-siteX" keys. I also wonder whether Google at all is worth trying if search queries have to be routinely manipulated this way.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Try this
by Kivada on Sat 31st May 2014 00:05 in reply to "Try this"
Kivada Member since:

Actually I'd be happier if Google hadn't crippled Youtube's search functions. seems it's now impossible to omit items from the results on Youtube, to do so you have to do a google site search with the terms and omissions against

Reply Parent Score: 4