Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 31st May 2014 20:29 UTC
Windows

Microsoft has stopped providing XP users with security updates, forcing them to either upgrade to another, newer operating system, or gamble with their safety. While the latest usage figures show that a large portion of users are moving away from XP, there's still a sizable number of users who aren't - or can't.

If you're an XP user, or know some XP users, there's a trick which makes it possible to receive security updates for the aging OS for another five years - right up until April 2019.

I have a better solution. No registry hacks required!

Thread beginning with comment 589847
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: to be honest
by UltraZelda64 on Sat 31st May 2014 21:49 UTC in reply to "to be honest"
UltraZelda64
Member since:
2006-12-05

XP was noisy as hell. Upon first install, you were given a worthless Flash "tour" of the operating system (which you would have to skip manually with ESC) before the OS would even boot, and then when you're finally in there it would be saying there's a tour in the system tray, which you had no choice to click just to close to get it to shut up. The OS whined that there was no firewall (pre-SP2), that there was no anti-virus software installed, that it needed activation. The list goes on... it just wouldn't shut the fuck up.

On top of all that, I recall going through ridiculous amounts of time, literally running all over the OS, in every damn corner and aspect of its functionality, just to get the operating system's settings decently tolerable. This included various control panel sections, options of key programs (Explorer), changing the theme, unhiding countless things that should not be hidden in the first place, and even worse, a bunch of crap could only be fixed by digging deep into the bowels of the registry.

Needless to say none of this was fun. A time consuming pain in the ass is what Windows XP was, to get the OS to perform and function in a tolerable way.

Windows 7 has quieted this obnoxiously annoying noise down immensely, with activation being the major one that remains. It will automatically download Microsoft Security Essentials (if you let it) and leave you the hell alone about anti-virus software. A software firewall is standard. No more retarded tour.

In conclusion, XP *sucked* compared to 7. Hell, I would say it sucked even compared to Windows 98SE before it in many ways. Looking back, I thought WinME brought in nothing but junk and bloat (and instability). WinXP unfortunately brought all that junk and bloat with it, but at least (being built on the NT kernel) it did not bring the instability. That was pretty much my only reason for upgrading to it: WinME just sucked so bad, and XP was comparably much better.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: to be honest
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sun 1st Jun 2014 13:17 in reply to "RE: to be honest"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

Yeah win 7 > win xp. Obviously, from a features and security standpoint. But you're getting a little crazy when you start talking about win 98 se being better. Oh my word that was bad. It was insecure, unstable, and lived in a world of dll hell that made the applications kill each other. Once you went to windows xp, you simply could not go back to windows 98 se ( unless you needed to due to missing drivers)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: to be honest
by UltraZelda64 on Thu 5th Jun 2014 02:43 in reply to "RE[2]: to be honest"
UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

But you're getting a little crazy when you start talking about win 98 se being better. Oh my word that was bad. It was insecure, unstable, and lived in a world of dll hell that made the applications kill each other. Once you went to windows xp, you simply could not go back to windows 98 se ( unless you needed to due to missing drivers)

You just described literally every single OS in the Win9x series and in fact the entire DOS family before it, and I would even argue (to a lesser extent), even the NT series. Certainly XP's original release was no saint when it comes to security, and its first couple service packs didn't exactly perfect it either. But have *you* ever tried ME? I would use 98SE any day over it. Yeah, I agree with XP over both of them though, if only for the increased stability... but Win98 was still a much less annoying OS.

I was unlucky in that I bought a new computer during the time that piece of shit, Windows ME, was being pawned off and forced onto people. It fucking *sucked*. I will take Windows 98SE, which I used previously, any day. And XP, the ONLY thing it had over both ME and 98, is stability. That's it. It was effectively a carbon copy of ME, but built on the NT kernel. It brought all the junk ME brought. But at least it didn't crash every two minutes and require a format/reinstall every eight due to file system corruption.

Reply Parent Score: 2