Linked by jockm on Thu 28th Aug 2014 22:18 UTC

Microsoft has explained that they have removed more than 1500 apps from the store.

Every app store finds its own balance between app quality and choice, which in turn opens the door to people trying to game the system with misleading titles or descriptions. Our approach has long been to create and enforce strong but transparent policies to govern our certification and store experience. Earlier this year we heard loud and clear that people were finding it more difficult to find the apps they were searching for; often having to sort through lists of apps with confusing or misleading titles.


This process is continuing as we work to be as thorough and transparent as possible in our review. Most of the developers behind apps that are found to violate our policies have good intentions and agree to make the necessary changes when notified. Others have been less receptive, causing us to remove more than 1,500 apps as part of this review so far (as always we will gladly refund the cost of an app that is downloaded as a result of an erroneous title or description).

The upside is that the store becomes a better, less cluttered and misleading place; the downside is that the walled garden is stronger. Is a top down approach really what we want, or is there a a better, community driven, approach that could be taken?

Thread beginning with comment 595237
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Yay for the walled garden!
by kompak on Fri 29th Aug 2014 20:00 UTC in reply to "Yay for the walled garden!"
Member since:

In the case of Apple (who like to be extra-strict about this), one approach would be to provide a web service that presents certain questions and warnings, and when the user completes the quiz, they get a code to enter into their iOS device to unlock installing of 3rd party apps.

I believe that's called jailbreaking.

Reply Parent Score: 1

theosib Member since:

No. Jailbreaking is when you unlock it without explicit support from the vendor. What I'm describing would be the vendor enabling an expert mode.

Reply Parent Score: 2