Linked by Alex Chejlyk on Mon 18th Jul 2005 17:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 5988
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
Regarding ESX: I've run an Exchange 5.5 server under ESX server in production for several years. Similar to the setup above, all mail is proxied by a linux firewall (which also performs virus checking and spam filtering) before reaching the exchange server. This IS a workable solution, even if it isn't optimal.
The real problem for Exchange replacements is authentication: none (as far as I know) integrate seamlessly into an NT domain for user authentication. Many users still on exchange 5.5 have also eschewed AD.