Linked by jessesmith on Wed 5th Nov 2014 10:39 UTC
Linux Over the past year I've been reading a lot of opinions on the new init technology, systemd. Some people think systemd is wonderful, the bee's knees. Others claim that systemd is broken by design. Some see systemd as a unifying force, a way to unite the majority of the Linux distributions. Others see systemd as a growing blob that is slowly becoming an overly large portion of the operating system. One thing that has surprised me a little is just how much people care about systemd, whether their opinion of the technology is good or bad. People in favour faithfully (and sometimes falsely) make wonderful claims about what systemd is and what it can supposedly do. Opponents claim systemd will divide the Linux community and drive many technical users to other operating systems. There is a lot of hype and surprisingly few people presenting facts.
Thread beginning with comment 599223
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: A cople of comments.
by edomaur on Thu 6th Nov 2014 21:46 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: A cople of comments."
Member since:

And here is the thing. In the past, deciding what kind of init to use was up to the admin in charge.

That's bullshit. Admin are using default init. If they weren't, the systemd outcry would not have been, ever.

Reply Parent Score: 2