Linked by Rayiner Hashem on Tue 15th Nov 2005 17:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 60784
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Very good article, too many complaints
by on Thu 17th Nov 2005 21:38
in reply to "RE[2]: Very good article, too many complaints"
I cannot say. I can only say that you really should get a 7200 rpm drive. I have a 4500? Or maybe a 5400 and it simply doesn't perform with garageband. But, if you say you have tested it, do not let my opinion prevent you from buying it. My own experiences on my powerbook simply aren't too good but I have a slow drive.
RE[4]: Very good article, too many complaints
by Pasha on Fri 18th Nov 2005 07:07
in reply to "RE[3]: Very good article, too many complaints"
I had a very brief tesing in a store, no chance to record anything only created an 8 bar song like described.
That's why I'm asking confirmation to people with real experiences. Anyway here on OSnews has been posted an article about new iBook in January.....what to think?
what to do? Such a messy situation!





Member since:
2005-07-06
Hi,
Sorry to be OT but in the Apple forumes they suggested me Mac Mini or iBook 12"/14" for GB, provided that I buy and external 7200RPM drive (FW).
BTW, I have recently tested an iBook 12", I was able to make 11 Tracks (9 Real Instruments, using loops + 2 Software Instruments)- 75% CPU. This goes really close to my XP 1.6Ghz Centrino Tecra M2 running Cubase : 16 Audio Tracks + effects (2 Compressors, 3 Reverb, 1 Flanger) + 2 Vsti - Cubase Virtual Instruments, Drums and VB1 (Virtual Bass) - 40% CPU.
I know that Software tracks can be frozen thus transforming them in audio tracks, giving CPU more free cycles. So in your opinion what machine should I buy?