To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think Nuvola looks horrible in GNOME, but it's beautiful in my KDE desktop
You have strange tastes then, since Nuvola is rendered through SVG in Gnome (so it looks good and polished at any resolution), and is pre-rendered bitmaps in KDE.
Perhaps last time you got that opinion, you still used an old version of librsvg which still was a bit buggy, so the pre-rendered icons where sometimes better, but still.
I think Nuvola looks horrible in GNOME, but it's beautiful in my KDE desktop
You have strange tastes then, since Nuvola is rendered through SVG in Gnome (so it looks good and polished at any resolution), and is pre-rendered bitmaps in KDE.
Well, I would imagine that there is more to looks, than just the quality of the rendering. Choice of colors as compared to the surrounding desktop might be one candidate. ;-)





Member since:
2005-07-22
I agree with Anonymous (Subject: Great Work!). We don't need the same iconset for totally different desktop projects. I don't like the way GNOME icons look outside GNOME. And I think Nuvola looks horrible in GNOME, but it's beautiful in my KDE desktop.
The need for a standard in naming conventions is ok, but that should be the only thing the tango project mandates.
Edited 2005-11-16 19:39