Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Nov 2015 13:53 UTC
Apple

The reviews for the Apple Surface are coming in. There's two reviews at The Verge, one at the Wall Street Journal, and John Gruber's got early access from Apple as well.

The general gist? If you've ever read a Surface Pro review, you've read all the iPad Pro reviews. Well, mostly - the complaints leveled at the Surface Pro are being tip-toed around a bit now that they apply to an Apple product, of course, and suddenly, the magic argument "but it will get better in the future" is now completely valid, while the same argument is never considered valid for the Surface Pro (or something like the Priv and its early bugs).

That being said, all reviews dive into just how uncomfortable the iPad Pro is to use as a laptop - and the problem, of course, is iOS itself. iOS is a mobile, touch-first operating system that Apple is now trying to shoehorn into a laptop role. iOS provides no support for mice or trackpads, and the keyboard and iOS lack most basic shortcut keys, so in order to do anything other than typing, you'll need to lift your arm and reach for the screen to use touch. This is something Apple has mocked for years as the reason not to include touch on laptops, and now they release a device which requires it 100%.

This is what happens when you run out of ideas and try to shoehorn your cashcow - iOS - into a role it was never intended to fulfill, without being gutsy enough to make the changes it requires. The iPad Pro is clearly screaming for a touchpad (and proper keyboard shortcuts), but it doesn't have any, and according to John Gruber, it never will (a comment I filed away for later when Apple inevitably adds mouse support to iOS).

Microsoft's Surface may not be perfect, but its problems stem almost exclusively not from a lack in hardware capability or a faulty concept, but from Microsoft's Metro environment being utterly shit. The concept of having a tablet and a laptop in the same device, seamlessly switching between a tablet UI and a desktop UI, is sound - the only problem is that Microsoft doesn't have a working tablet UI and applications. Meanwhile, trying to shoehorn a mobile, touch-first UI into a laptop form factor is just as silly and idiotic as trying to shoehorn a desktop UI into a mobile, touch-first form factor - and Apple should know better.

Or should they? Paul Thurrott, earlier this week:

While the iPad Pro was in many ways inevitable, it also points to a crisis of original thought at Apple, which has been coasting on the iPhone’s coattails for perhaps too long. At Apple, the solution to every problem is another iPhone. And the iPad Pro, like the new Apple TV and the Apple Watch, is really just another attempt to duplicate that singular success in other markets.

Thurrott really hits the nail on the head. The iPhone became a success because Apple sought - and succeeded in - designing an interface and interaction model that was specifically designed for the iPhone's input methods - the multitouch display, the home button. Ever since that major big hit, they've been trying to shoehorn that exact same interface and interaction model into every major new product - the Apple Watch, the new Apple TV, and now the iPad Pro. However, if there's one thing we've learned from Palm OS (pen-first, mobile-first) and iOS (multitouch-first, mobile-first), it's that every form factor needs a tailored interaction model - not a shoehorned one.

When you're a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - which sums up Apple's new major product lines ever since the release of the iPhone, and the iPad Pro seems no different. It will do great as an iPad+, but beyond that? It's not going to make a single, meaningful dent, without considerable restructuring of iOS' UI and interaction models - and lots and lots of crow.

Thread beginning with comment 620747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ezraz
Member since:
2012-06-20

I was doing some work for a huge school district in the US the other week and needed to get a VPN tunnel from OSX. The lady says "you'll have to ask IT, but I'm pretty sure they don't do MAC"

The all caps MAC is the giveaway. It's never good. They literally don't even know how to type it's name. It was like 1994 all over again.

The IT guy called me and tried to get it going but said "sorry our VPN doesn't have a mac client, are you sure you don't have a windows machine around?". I laughed and launched windows, told him I hadn't had an actual windows machine on my desk in about 12 years.

He said "sorry, our VPN client requires a real windows machine, not one running in virtualization." I asked him how the client knew this and he had no answer.

I said "30k employees and you don't have any macs at all?"

"Well about 10% of our users are using apple."

"How do they connect?"

No answer. "Sorry, you'll have to get a windows machine".

I guess there's 3000 angry mac users in that district.

I'm left to screen share a zombie machine to get any work done because they purchased from the wrong VPN vendor.

Edited 2015-11-12 17:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

ezraz,

That's about right, many environments don't have OSX and they expect you to use what they use instead. I get the same reaction using Linux. It means that I require windows to do my work because many/most clients use proprietary windows software.

I can't emphasize enough how much I prefer standardized protocols, however the choice isn't mine to make and if anything I'm actually seeing a move away from "open" technology like IPSEC and towards proprietary solutions.

Interestingly this scenario is slightly reversed on the mobile side, where clients expect you to have an IOS device by default.

Reply Parent Score: 3