Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 21st Nov 2005 23:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 63258
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Reading isn't enough
Besides that, the licensing issues are very problematic, at least in USA.
To me this is nothing but a PR-stunt.
Main critisisms of Microsoft is: Closed formats, or only open under closed licenses. You cannot legally create a GPL'ed reader for MS Office XML files. At least not in USA.







Member since:
2005-06-30
It won't bring anything to the end user other than the warm, cosy feeling that if MS goes out of business, all of your documents saved in the Office 12 format (OpenXML) will have documented specifications and someone would be able to create a document reader that will run on your computer. Someone could create a reader before then as well, but it wouldn't really be worth it since MS will supply one for the time being.
One of the biggest criticisms people have about MS file formats right now is that for the most part they haven't been documented by anyone outside of MS. What happens if you want to open a document ten, twenty, or thirty years from now? It is very unlikely that you'll have the same software installed, and if MS isn't around to sell you a document reader/writer, that could be quite difficult. It's already hard enough to open a document created five years ago with current software.
Edited 2005-11-22 00:26