Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Aug 2016 21:28 UTC

The Windows 10 Anniversary Update was released earlier this evening, and I dutifully installed it so that I could write about any oddities that might pop up. Well, a number of oddities have popped up, and they're bad - really bad. The Anniversary Update does some really shady stuff during installation that it doesn't inform you of at all until after the fact.

First, the Anniversary Update reinstalls Skype "for you", even if you had it uninstalled earlier, which in and of itself is a blatant disregard for users - I uninstalled it for a reason, and I'd like Microsoft to respect that. That in and of itself is bad enough, but here's the kicker: during installation, Microsoft also automatically logs you into Skype, so that possible Skype contacts can just start calling or messaging you - again, without ever asking for the user's consent.

Imagine my surprise when I open that useless Metro notification center thing - whose button now sits in the bottom right of the task bar, right of the clock, even, and is unremovable - and see that Skype is now installed, and that I'm logged in. This is a blatant disregard for users, and I'm sure tons of users will be unpleasantly surprised to see Microsoft forcing Skype down their throats.

There was an even bigger surprise, though: during installation of the Anniversary Update, Microsoft apparently flags Classic Shell - a popular Start menu replacement that gives Windows 10 a customisable Start menu that doesn't suck - as incompatible with the Anniversary Update, and just straight-up deletes hides it from your computer - again, without ever notifying you beforehand or asking you for your permission.

Update: actually, the application isn't removed entirely - it's still there in the Program Files folder, but it's entirely scrapped from search results and the Start menu. Effectively, for most users, that's identical to removing it. What an incredibly odd and user-hostile way of dealing with this. You can see how the wording in the screenshot below is confusing regarding the removing vs. hiding issue.

Classic Shell released an update to fix the compatibility issue detected, so I hope my settings are still there somewhere, because it'd suck having to redo all of them because Microsoft just randomly deleted a program from my computer hid a program, without informing me or asking me for my permission. It could've just disabled the program, prevented it from running - why delete hide it entirely? Are they that desperate to try and get me to use their terrible excuse for a Start menu?

So, just in case you're about to install this update - Microsoft will force Skype down your throat, and may randomly delete hide programs from your computer without asking for your permission.

Have fun.

Thread beginning with comment 632692
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: There's no free lunch
by Sauron on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 12:17 UTC in reply to "There's no free lunch"
Member since:

Agreed. Which is why Microsoft and Windows 10 are "dead" to me.
I'm unsure what I'll do once Windows 7 reaches EOL but 10 won't be it. I already use other OS's for most stuff other than gaming where I use mostly Windows 7. Hopefully developers will start releasing more stuff for platforms other than Windows as I'll be moving off of Windows entirely once 7 is EOL. Unless things change, which is highly unlikely!

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: There's no free lunch
by wigry on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 13:30 in reply to "RE: There's no free lunch"
wigry Member since:

Same here, I did buy W7 Retail specifically before W8 came out and I saw that it will be a mess. Currently I am patiently on W7 and letting MS do its stuff. Once the W7 will EOL in 2020, I will look around to see how the landscape has evolved and decide what to do next.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: There's no free lunch
by Morgan on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 13:48 in reply to "RE: There's no free lunch"
Morgan Member since:

If you don't already use Steam (and I understand if you don't, it is after all a DRM scheme at its core), maybe create an account and port in your existing Windows games to your Steam library (backing up your original software of course). Then, install Steam on Linux, and allow it to install the Linux compatible versions of any of the games in your library. Make sure Steam is set to report to the hardware/software survey, and you've just successfully voted for more Linux gaming support.

Last I heard, Linux was up a whole 0.02% in Steam's hardware/software survey. That's absolutely pathetic, and the only way Valve will continue its efforts to port as many games as possible to Linux is to see more people using it.

I wish there was a way to get other, superior (from a DRM-free standpoint) game publishers to port to Linux or even better, do native Linux development. I know is generally positive towards Linux but they don't go out of their way to push the platform live Valve does. But the more you blog about it, post in forums about it, and just play your Linux games and allow them to be reported to Steam, the more the word gets out.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: There's no free lunch
by darknexus on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 14:54 in reply to "RE[2]: There's no free lunch"
darknexus Member since:

I wish Linux were more friendly to commercial developers in the first place.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: There's no free lunch
by Sauron on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 20:23 in reply to "RE[2]: There's no free lunch"
Sauron Member since:

I use Steam on both Windows and Linux, the latter for the last 2 or 3 years. I don't have a huge Steam library but nearly half of what I do have has a Linux port so it's not too bad.
I find Wine very useful also for running some stuff, it will run games that don't even work on Windows after 98 so it's a big bonus.
Shame Loki isn't still around, maybe someone will pick up where they left off eventually. One can always hope!

Reply Parent Score: 4