Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 12th Nov 2016 22:32 UTC
Android

A few days ago, Google filed its official response to the EU antritrust investigation into Android. The company details its main arguments on the Android Blog, and it's definitely worth a read. The blog post is remarkably open about one of Android's main shortcomings - fragmentation.

To manage this challenge, we work with hardware makers to establish a minimum level of compatibility among Android devices. Critically, we give phone makers wide latitude to build devices that go above that baseline, which is why you see such a varied universe of Android devices. That's the key: our voluntary compatibility agreements enable variety while giving developers confidence to create apps that run seamlessly across thousands of different phones and tablets. This balance stimulates competition between Android devices as well as between Android and Apple's iPhone.

Android's compatibility rules help minimize fragmentation and sustain a healthy ecosystem for developers. Ninety-four percent of respondents who answered questions on fragmentation in a Commission market survey said that it harms the Android platform. Developers worry about it, and our competitors with proprietary platforms (who don't face the same risk) regularly criticize us for it. The Commission's proposal risks making fragmentation worse, hurting the Android platform and mobile phone competition.

The whole post is worth a read. As I've said before - I'm glad the EU keeps these large companies on their toes, but the accusations regarding Android seem way off base to me. In the end, market regulation needs to benefit consumers, not harm them - and it's easy to see how fragmenting Android into incompatible Samsung, Sony, HTC, and Google Androids would definitely harm consumers and developers alike.

I think there's a lot more fodder to be found looking at the relationship between companies like Samsung and Apple on the one hand, and carriers on the other. On top of that, the EU could've invested a lot more effort into fostering alternative platforms, instead of letting Microsoft ruin Nokia and run it into the ground (speaking of places where there's fodder to be found).

Nobody wants the proverbial Android N.

Thread beginning with comment 636979
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Missing the point entirely
by emphyrio on Sun 13th Nov 2016 15:51 UTC in reply to "RE: Missing the point entirely"
emphyrio
Member since:
2007-09-11

No, I am arguing that google is illegally using its monopoly to discourage phone companies from installing alternative applications.

This has nothing to do with android fragmentation.

Reply Parent Score: 2

nicubunu Member since:
2014-01-08

Which is not true since every single Android phone on the market, except Nexuses an Pixels, come pre-installed with some alternative applications.

Reply Parent Score: 3