To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Perhaps you're right. I am not that familiar with the toolkit (I do development development in KDE). Still, I believe this kind of stuff should be done automatically. I have used a few GTK applications (GIMP, Gaim, Inkscape, perhaps one or two I don't remember) and while their look wasn't bad, their feeling was alien. They had the quirks I described. It doesn't make the applications crappy nor useless, but they look more like ports!
I don't think hatred or disrespect has anything to do with it. It's more a matter of securing same behaviour across platforms than securing a "native" look and feel on each platform.
It does feel slightly foreign, but this is true for many applications incl. several from Microsoft (Media Player and MSN Messenger, Outlook, Office 2003 etc.)
But no doubt wxWidgets, FLTK and Fox Tool Kit have a much more native feel than GTK+, but this has nothing to do with the tool kit working good or not. Stability has something to do with that.
My opinion have nothing to do with the amount of time or money invested in the project. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work, whether I gave 10 grands or I paid nothing. As for my complaints, they are more observations.
By the way, "trolling" and "I don't agree with you" are two different things.





Member since:
2005-06-30
Define "pretty well". To me, its look and feel is foreign (even with Wimp; you got the inversed button order, the GNOME file dialog... with the latest version I tried (2.6.8), anyway) and it got the sluggish redraw time. Hardly what I would call "pretty well".
To me, it looks like more a port than a supported platform. I hope the OS X port is going to get a better treatement (which I do not doubt since this platform got more respect and less hatred than Win32).