Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jul 2005 19:43 UTC
Microsft has made hard statements about perfomance improvements in Longhorn. They claim that applications will load 15% faster than in XP, while boot time is decreased by 50%. They also claimed that Longhorn will be able to wake up from sleep in 2 seconds. Users should also expect half as many reboots during patching. Time to dust of those trustworthy stopwatches.
Thread beginning with comment 6430
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
I have no love for M$, but given the quantum leap XP was over it's predecessors, I'm willing to give them the benefit of a doubt...
That was not that hard, considering the quality of its predecessors... By the way, windows XP was what win95 should have been, and they told it would be.
Yeah, I'm running short of faith here. Why should I trust them this time?