Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Jul 2017 20:57 UTC
AMD

Last night out of the blue, we received an email from AMD, sharing some of the specifications for the forthcoming Ryzen Threadripper CPUs to be announced today. Up until this point, we knew a few things - Threadripper would consist of two Zeppelin dies featuring AMD's latest Zen core and microarchitecture, and would essentially double up on the HEDT Ryzen launch. Double dies means double pretty much everything: Threadripper would support up to 16 cores, up to 32 MB of L3 cache, quad-channel memory support, and would require a new socket/motherboard platform called X399, sporting a massive socket with 4094-pins (and also marking an LGA socket for AMD). By virtue of being sixteen cores, AMD is seemingly carving a new consumer category above HEDT/High-End Desktop, which we’ve coined the 'Super High-End Desktop', or SHED for short.

AMD is listing the top of the line Threadripper 1950X for 999 dollars, which gives you 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base frequency of 3.4Ghz (and a turbo frequency of 4.0Ghz) at a TDP of 180W (nothing to sneeze at). These are two quite amazing processors, and later next year, the pricing should definitely come down a bit so it's a bit more affordable for regular computer use as well.

Well done, AMD. Sure, we need to await the benchmarks for more information, but this is looking real good. I'm hoping this will finally start forcing developers - specifically of games - to start making more and better use of multicore.

Thread beginning with comment 646725
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Now only...
by mistersoft on Fri 14th Jul 2017 11:18 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Now only..."
mistersoft
Member since:
2011-01-05

And I should be in the market for a new HEDT at the end of the year and TR 1950X vs i9 7900X is an enticingly difficult choice...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Now only...
by grat on Fri 14th Jul 2017 12:23 in reply to "RE[3]: Now only..."
grat Member since:
2006-02-02

44 PCIe lanes (Intel) vs 64 PCIe lanes (AMD).

Considering that two graphics cards (x16 * 2) + 1 nvme SSD (x4) is already 36 lanes, I think Intel may regret only having 44 lanes.

Initially, the TDP (power draw) of the AMD chips is a bit scary, but it's "only" 11.25 watts/core, whereas Intel is at 14 watts/core.

Reply Parent Score: 2