Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Aug 2017 10:51 UTC

In this mini-test, we compared AMD's Game Mode as originally envisioned by AMD. Game Mode sits as an extra option in the AMD Ryzen Master software, compared to Creator Mode which is enabled by default. Game Mode does two things: firstly, it adjusts the memory configuration. Rather than seeing the DRAM as one uniform block of memory with an ‘average’ latency, the system splits the memory into near memory closest to the active CPU, and far memory for DRAM connected via the other silicon die. The second thing that Game Mode does is disable the cores on one of the silicon dies, but retains the PCIe lanes, IO, and DRAM support. This disables cross-die thread migration, offers faster memory for applications that need it, and aims to lower the latency of the cores used for gaming by simplifying the layout. The downside of Game Mode is raw performance when peak CPU is needed: by disabling half the cores, any throughput limited task is going to be cut by losing half of the throughput resources. The argument here is that Game mode is designed for games, which rarely use above 8 cores, while optimizing the memory latency and PCIe connectivity.

I like how AnandTech calls this a "mini" test.

In any event - even though Threadripper is probably way out of the league of us regular people, I'm really loving how AMD's recent products have lit a fire under the processor market specifically and the self-built desktop market in general. Ever since Ryzen hit the market, now joined by Vega and Threadripper, we're back to comparing numbers and arguing over which numbers are better. We're back to the early 2000s, and it feels comforting and innocent - because everyone is right and everyone is wrong, all at the same time, because everything 100% depends on your personal budget and your personal use cases and no amount of benchmarks or number crunching is going to change your budget or personal use case.

I'm loving every second of this.

Thread beginning with comment 648116
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Interesting
by dpJudas on Fri 18th Aug 2017 17:20 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Interesting"
Member since:

The average user isn't buying threadripper.

It is a high end consumer product. Such people are not expected to know what NUMA even is.

Just because poor people can't afford it doesn't mean it is a device for professionals only.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Interesting
by _txf_ on Sat 19th Aug 2017 01:29 in reply to "RE[5]: Interesting"
_txf_ Member since:

A person buying a high end consumer product is going to want to fiddle with it. Let them figure it out, it isn't like this information is hard to find. They don't have to care about NUMA or not, all they have to do is see whether all cores are enabled or not, and that is simple to do.

And if they're interested in fire-and-forget, they should just leave it in normal mode. It doesn't make that much of a difference.

Edited 2017-08-19 01:29 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3