Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Sep 2017 22:16 UTC
Oracle and SUN

Remember, back in December 2016, when there were rumours Oracle was killing Solaris? And how a month later, Solaris effectively switched to maintenance mode, and then to a "continuous deliver model"?

The news from the ex-Sun community jungle drums is that the January rumours were true and Oracle laid off the core talent of the Solaris and SPARC teams on Friday. That surely has to mean a maintenance-only future for the product range, especially with Solaris 12 cancelled. A classic Oracle "silent EOL", no matter what they claim.

With the hardware deprecated, my guess is that's the last of the Sun assets Oracle acquired written off. Just how good were Oracle's decisions on buying Sun?

Sun's Solaris is dead.

Bryan Cantrill on this news (this Bryan Cantrill):

As had been rumored for a while, Oracle effectively killed Solaris on Friday. When I first saw this, I had assumed that this was merely a deep cut, but in talking to Solaris engineers still at Oracle, it is clearly much more than that. It is a cut so deep as to be fatal: the core Solaris engineering organization lost on the order of 90% of its people, including essentially all management.

[...]

Judging merely by its tombstone, the life of Solaris can be viewed as tragic: born out of wedlock between Sun and AT&T and dying at the hands of a remorseless corporate sociopath a quarter century later. And even that may be overstating its longevity: Solaris may not have been truly born until it was made open source, and - certainly to me, anyway - it died the moment it was again made proprietary. But in that shorter life, Solaris achieved the singular: immortality for its revolutionary technologies. So while we can mourn the loss of the proprietary embodiment of Solaris (and we can certainly lament the coarse way in which its technologists were treated!), we can rejoice in the eternal life of its technologies - in illumos and beyond!

Thread beginning with comment 648607
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Long Dead
by yerverluvinunclebert on Tue 5th Sep 2017 19:06 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Long Dead"
yerverluvinunclebert
Member since:
2014-05-03

That's a different argument. Let's change our words to suit new facts.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Long Dead
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 5th Sep 2017 19:47 in reply to "RE[4]: Long Dead"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

Sorry, my first note was too brief, but that is indeed what I meant.

I have the utmost respect and admiration for the innovations that were contained within Sparc and Solaris. Technologically, they were without a peer.

Reply Parent Score: 2