Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Nov 2005 20:51 UTC, submitted by Anon_Poster
Thread beginning with comment 64914
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In some ways it did, but the lmbench numbers are particularly damning. Lmbench is a very simple benchmark, but since UNIX is a very simple system, it gets to the heart of a lot of UNIX performance issues. It'll tell you what the basic primitives of your program cost, and on OS X, these primatives are very expensive.





I am. btw, a Mac user and have no issues.
Member since:
2005-07-06
True, the benchmarks used were also brought up, for example, the MySQL issue was more a situation of HFS+ being over caucious when it came ot reading/writing data - a number of Apple and MacOS programmers pulled it to bits.
Now sure, there are some improvements that need to be made, but I think the article painted MacOS X to be worse than it really was.