Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Oct 2017 10:47 UTC
Windows

All of the new design changes to Windows 10 are demonstrated in a new video from Microsoft. It’s a good showcase of how subtle the changes are, but it doesn’t tease much for the future. Microsoft’s Fluent Design System is designed to be the true successor to Microsoft's Metro design, and will appear across apps and services on Windows, iOS, and Android. Microsoft is focusing on light, depth, motion, material, and scale for its Fluent Design, with animations that make the design feel like it's moving during interactions in Windows.

Like Metro applications before them, these Fluent applications look really nice, but it's all for naught. Microsoft showed off its redesigned Outlook application for Windows (and macOS), and guess what? It's a Win32 application.

If not even Microsoft itself is interested in making Metro/Fluent applications, why should anyone else?

Microsoft's approach to Metro/Fluent has been baffling from day one, and it doesn't seem like anything's changing any time soon. They made really great Metro Office applications, but then proceed to hide them from the Windows Store behind the "mobile" tag, and artificially cripple them by not allowing you to open more than one document per Office application.

Even when Microsoft does make great Metro/Fluent applications, they artificially cripple them.

I have no idea what Microsoft is doing, and I don't blame developers for giving them the finger. They are telling an unreliable, unfocused, unclear, and chaotic developer story, and any developer worth her salt wouldn't touch the Windows Store/Metro/Fluent with a ten-foot pole.

Thread beginning with comment 649955
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by x86_x64
by ssokolow on Mon 16th Oct 2017 20:59 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by x86_x64"
ssokolow
Member since:
2010-01-21

None of you would've complained had I used "he".

¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Only because I'd have come across needlessly sounding like a jerk. While I don't mention it, I usually notice and I always use Singular They in what I say and write.

(Though I'm almost certainly an anomaly, given that I'm a language nerd with a side interest in gender's relationship to society and psychology.)

Edited 2017-10-16 21:01 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Comment by x86_x64
by leech on Tue 17th Oct 2017 00:28 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by x86_x64"
leech Member since:
2006-01-10

Goddamn political correctness bullshit. We should all be referred to as 'Its'. That way no one can assume gender bias. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Comment by x86_x64
by henderson101 on Wed 18th Oct 2017 08:36 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by x86_x64"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

I always use Singular They in what I say and write.


In British English, "they" is generally promoted in schools now over a gender specific term. I certainly remember being gently turned towards using it in the 1980/1990's.

Reply Parent Score: 3