Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Nov 2017 23:31 UTC

Top officials from Facebook, Google, and Twitter told a congressional panel Tuesday that their platforms hosted a disinformation campaign carried out over their networks by Russian state actors. The propaganda centered on the presidential election, immigration, gun rights, gay rights, and racial issues, the companies said. None of the three organizations said they supported proposed legislation requiring them to disclose who is buying political advertisements on their platforms, although these Web companies promised more public transparency about who is buying ads on their networks.

All political spending must be disclosed in some form or another in most countries, so I see no reason why ad spending on Facebook or Twitter should be any different. I also like the idea to make it illegal - or impossible - for foreign entities to buy ad space for political content; as in, a French entity would not be able to buy political ads in The Netherlands. It's already illegal in, say, the US for foreign entities to donate or spend money on candidates, so there's definitely precedent.

The real issue, however, is that it might be hard, though, to define what is a political ad, and what isn't.

Thread beginning with comment 650525
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by philcostin
by Dr.Cyber on Thu 2nd Nov 2017 20:45 UTC in reply to "Comment by philcostin"
Member since:

You got it all wrong! The west is the only place that does not use propaganda! The news in the West is always right, even the government is involved in it so it has to be! All threats to our liberty and justice come from outside so that is why we must let the government take away our liberty and justice so that they can protect us from the terrorists outside so that the terrorists outside cannot take our liberty and justice away from us!

We need more regulations to protect us from free speech and wrongthink! We need more regulations on the market! Both enforced by violence! For the sake of our human rights we need to get rid of our human rights!

The above two paragraphs are sarcasm.

Reply Parent Score: 2