Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Feb 2018 23:08 UTC

In November last year I wrote about the forgotten and obscure feature of early Windows 95 builds that lets you run Windows 3.1 in a window on Windows 95. Since then I was wondering if this would still work on the final build (950) of Windows 95, considering so much has changed since build 58s.

I won't spoil it.

Thread beginning with comment 653603
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I installed OS/2 Warp (via floppy disks) on my 486dx4 133 MHz system with 8? 16? MB of RAM back in university. Unfortunately, it had a WinModem installed and couldn't connect to the Internet via dial-up. ;)

But, it included Win-OS/2, and there were Win 3.x drivers for the modem. ;) Once it was connected via Windows, the OS/2 apps could surf the web/gopher/IRC/chat. ;)

Eventually got Win98SE running on that system as there wasn't much in the way of useful OS/2 software. But it was fun playing around with it while it lasted.

Reply Parent Score: 5

brostenen Member since:

True... Shure there were the standard text editor and spreadsheet, that were on the bonus pack. They were usefull to an extent. I did not have my machine on the internet untill around 2001. It was on a new machine that I had gotten at that time. So I ran Win98 untill I could get WinXP. I got it when SP2 were released, and ran it untill Win7. Then I switched to Linux in 2016 for good. Yeah... Os/2 was a pretty good operating system, and I really enjoyed using it. Programs were, as you mention it, a big drawback. Yet it was the best operating system during that time period. Again... It failed due to a bad software catalog. If only..... If only just.

Reply Parent Score: 2

zima Member since:

Though OS/2 had the ultimate goal of returning to IBM the control over computer market perhaps it's better that it didn't succeed.

Edited 2018-02-08 00:25 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4