Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 27th Nov 2005 22:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 65612
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
I'd love to see more than anecdotal evidence suggesting iptables is faster than PF. There was a paper _years_ ago that compared iptables, ipfilter and PF; at the time, iptables was marginally faster because it wasn't tracking states properly.
I don't see any advantage to the netfilter modules, with the possible exception of L7 filtering. There is a built-in ftp proxy, QoS support (for VoIP), and IPsec filtering native to PF. Not to mention a lot of other features that Linux/iptables can't touch... pfsync (stateful synchronization), sasyncd (IPsec SA synchronization), etc.
-jd