Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Nov 2005 21:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 67134
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
> Watch the video.
Are you seriously suggesting that a 16-18 fps video of a 320x200 (or somesuch) video (encoded in who knows what format) is supposed to show that the CPU in question is capable of displaying common video files (e.g. 512x384 XviD and 720x576 DVD) at 25-30 fps? Oh, c'mon!