Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Dec 2005 21:02 UTC
Apple "It saddens me to say that Aperture's innovations are only skin deep. If it could deliver on the promise of being both fast and produce flawless results, it would be the dream package. At this point it is an expensive and questionable alternative to Camera Raw, a free extension to Photoshop, and Adobe's Bridge which can batch produce better quality images in arguably less time. For $500 [EUR 425] (Photoshop itself retails for $750 [EUR 636]), there is no excuse not to be aware of professional needs like a high-quality sharpen tool, DNG exporting or more basic things like curves, a sampler tool for RGB pixel readings, or retention of EXIF data on output."
Thread beginning with comment 69280
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why is this article here?
by MightyPenguin on Tue 6th Dec 2005 15:05 UTC
Member since:

This is OSnews not PSNews or ArtistNews, what does a photoshop plugin have to do with OS News? This isn't /. here. To be fair you should start carrying announcements for Gimp and Krita if you're going to bother showing news for Photoshop.

Reply Score: -5