Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 11th Dec 2005 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 71142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-10-02
I agree (to a certain extent).
Repairing broken Microsoft code is something I'd really like to do, but we can't since the license is non free.
MS uses occasionally BSD-code, but under another license. Therefore it's not free, which is problematic when it breaks down (which it does).
We agree on the BSD-license so no reason to fight over that. It's free as long as people don't close it, but when closed it's no longer free.
So, basically we agree. I prefer the GPL over any other license. No doubt about that.