Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Dec 2005 15:00 UTC, submitted by anonymous
General Development "HTML isn't a very good language for making Web pages. However, it has been a very good language for making the Web. This article examines the future of HTML and what it will mean to Web authors, browser and developers. It covers the incremental approach embodied by the WHATWG specifications and the radical cleanup of XHTML proposed by the W3C. Additionally, the author gives an overview of the W3C's new Rich Client Activity."
Thread beginning with comment 71715
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I don't like it
by re_re on Tue 13th Dec 2005 01:49 UTC
re_re
Member since:
2005-07-06

>Why bash Safari? Safari passes the Acid test, and it's the only browser capable (with Konqueror) to properly apply CSS2 shadows (check the header in http://cogscanthink.blogsome.com , only Safari and Konq. can render that shadow).<


Damn, I checked out that link on konqueror3.5 and on deer park side by side, the difference is impressive. I have noticed an inate quality in how Konqueror renders web pages that I have yet to see in another browser (except safari) which is why I prefer it over firefox.

Edited 2005-12-13 01:53