Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 13th Dec 2005 07:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 72119
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: opposite conclusions
by load_mic on Tue 13th Dec 2005 14:42
in reply to "RE: opposite conclusions"
RE[2]: opposite conclusions
by Sphinx on Tue 13th Dec 2005 15:15
in reply to "RE: opposite conclusions"






Member since:
2005-07-06
I say blame the DOJ for breaking up Bell, and thus absolutely and totally destroying the most important and inventive research facility during the 20th century (if not of all recorded history).
Now we have Lucent Technologies... A company that used to be Bell Labs, the research arm of Bell, trying to stay afloat because they have to come up with products to sell (like a damn answering machine).
So Lucent, formerly Bell Labs, is trying to make money by selling answering machines (and other equipment) instead of researching new technologies (like the transistor).
How different would our world be if Bell had not been broken up? Today we still have a monopoly on phone services (Verizon), and phone service which is STILL of lesser quality than what Bell used to offer. We have Verizon with it's insanely high prices (rivaled only by Time-Warner's digital phone service).
Sorry, for some reason the whole failure in computere science line brought out some emotion!