Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Dec 2005 19:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 73650
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: i guess that's not sooo bad
by on Thu 15th Dec 2005 23:13
in reply to "RE[2]: i guess that's not sooo bad"
RE[3]: i guess that's not sooo bad
by Budd on Fri 16th Dec 2005 09:04
in reply to "RE[2]: i guess that's not sooo bad"
If I was a 20 year old frustrated kid, I wouldn't for sure calling anyone "sonny". This is not the first time when you exercise in public your sexual frustrations. Mod me down, feel free , but I can come with examples.
Why can't we mod OSNews so called "admins"? I bet Thom Holwerda would be gone by now.
RE[4]: i guess that's not sooo bad
by Tyr. on Fri 16th Dec 2005 09:18
in reply to "RE[3]: i guess that's not sooo bad"
Why can't we mod OSNews so called "admins"? I bet Thom Holwerda would be gone by now.
I agree the mods should post vitriol like this under a normal user account so it can be properly modded (down!). But hey although Thom makes a few bad calls once in a while is no reason to wish him gone.






Member since:
2005-06-29
They just said "We're using your icon, ummm for the sake of the user of course..."
Read the f--king article before commenting, sonny. This was a mutual descision made by BOTH Mozilla AND Microsoft.