Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Dec 2005 23:44 UTC, submitted by Lazarus
Thread beginning with comment 74987
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Maybe someone can clarify for me, but the OpenSolaris CDDL doesn't seem to be compatible with the revised BSD license under which DragonFly is released. Maybe I'm missing something?
You are.
1) CDDL is a file based license, not everything under DragonFly is under a "different" BSD license.
2) The DragonFly license is file based too.
3) Matt is no stranger to licensing I am fully confident that he knows what he's doing.
4) It is my personal belief that even the modified DragonFly BSD license could be considered compatible since again CDDL is a file based license...