To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
point (and reason of aarons critical stance) is that they should develop it in the open - the development would go faster as more ppl would send in bugreports and probably even patches, and the upcoming users (KDE, Gnome for example) could test it and give comments. also, the hardware driver developers (in kernel, or nvidia and ati) could also adapt their drivers and probably help.
so it sucks they keep it in-house, and imho it is a proof of the fact they still don't really understand "free software".
that is such BS .. you don't go live in a house before its built do you? no one wants to work on this project don't you get it? its been around forever. Just because you are curious and want to see the code being developed has nothing to do with openness. just let novell do their thing. personally i doubt this project will see the light of day for years.




Member since:
2005-07-06
There is no proof that Novell is doing this. This blog post is based on Dave Airlie's original post, it is not new information. I have talked with Dave and he does not have factual data to back up his suspicions.
http://www.livejournal.com/users/airlied/18241.html
It is unknown if Novell has officially sanctioned this or if it is being done as an off-the-books type project. It is also unknown if the project has sufficient resources to reach completion. As far as the facts go this could just be Dave Reveman working in his spare time and not feeling like committing his code.
This is just a conspiracy theory without facts to back it up.
If Novell is doing this, I welcome it because without their backing it would never get written.
Edited 2005-12-20 15:02