Linked by Anonymous Reader on Wed 21st Dec 2005 22:09 UTC
Yes it would be nice if X.org could use OpenGL directly for it's display and composition, but to date, nobody has made this possible. Is it wrong for a business to make it so? Since when does developing software for GNU products mean that they aren't allowed to do it privately? If Novell is developing XGL behind closed doors, and paying the developers to build it... Where's the problem?
Thread beginning with comment 77196
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-12-20
Geez, you're missing the point all together. The point of Open Source has nothing to do with the development process at all! The whole point to Open Source, is it having the code Open for use, alteration, improvement...you name it. Your logic is flawed and annoying honestly.