Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 23rd Dec 2005 11:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 77602
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: oh, not binary actually
by ziggamon on Fri 23rd Dec 2005 11:46
in reply to "oh, not binary actually"
Actually, this is entirely a good thing - as I understand it, redistribution rights means that they will cover any expenses for the patents so that anyone can redistribute it.
It doesn't mean it isn't open source, it's MIT licensed.
What I don't quite understand is - how is all this possible? What resources does Fluendo have that Redhat, Canonical or Novell don't, that they can provide MP3 support for free for everyone?
RE[2]: oh, not binary actually
by progster on Fri 23rd Dec 2005 11:55
in reply to "RE: oh, not binary actually"
>What I don't quite understand is - how is all this possible? What resources does Fluendo have that Redhat, Canonical or Novell don't, that they can provide MP3 support for free for everyone?
I second that, if it was "this easy", why didn't the big players do it? Surely, they have the money...






Member since:
Actually, I should have read all of this first. Seems it's not binary-only. But still, "redistribution rights" are not Free Software, and there are a lot more distros out there than just Ubuntu and Fedora. This seems like more of a surrender than a victory. Luckily OGG is better than MP3 anyway