To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Kudos to you guys for all this work.
And as for this -
Do you really think a distribution like Red Hat or Novell has nothing better to do than do all this ?
well, for their users they could hardly find anything better to do than this.
Byt he way, out of curiaosity: how much money does it cost? Clearly the sum is undisclosed, but could one give us some idea what is the order of magnitude? $100,000? Was it a one-time deal or annually paid sum?
Thanks for getting it done! We in userland appreciate it greatly! Does this mean I'll be able to rip, not just read? And will you work with Novell, RedHat, etc., to get it into the top distros? Hoping so....
IMO, the best solution for this situation is what you have done: satisfy Fraunhofer (sp?) legal requirements by contracting with them for royalties, but still being able to provide an open-source codec for the format. The RIAA isn't going to like this, since their DRM-ware on CDs won't prevent rips to MP3 on Linux boxes, but that only puts the enforcement of copyrights back to what it should be: legal action against violators, not restricted use by legal users. You have in effect swung the legal balance in that battle back in favor of "fair use" for legal users. No small feat, and not of small consequence.






Member since:
Who said this was easy ?

a) we spent hours and hours discussing what our options are to make this possible
b) we spent even more hours coming up with a plan that gives every one involved the best deal (normal users, distributors, us), and still satisfy our upstream obligations
c) we paid a bunch of money to get the license
d) we spent a lot of days actually molding the reference code into a maintainable project with readable and reasonably speedy code
e) we spent a lot of days integrating IPP into the build
Do you really think a distribution like Red Hat or Novell has nothing better to do than do all this ?