Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 24th Dec 2005 21:53 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "It's finally arrived - the first Mac Mini clone. Our review system was supplied by Evesham, but the barebone chassis is manufactured by AOpen and has been known as the 'Pandora'. Sadly this catchy name is gone - AOpen has re-named it the Mini PC, which is just plain boring. Anyhow, name aside, this is a really cool-looking little machine - it arguably looks even better than the Mac Mini, mainly due to its aluminium case."
Thread beginning with comment 78253
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: why?
by Duffman on Sun 25th Dec 2005 09:50 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: why?"
Duffman
Member since:
2005-11-23

1. It is too slow. I need *niX mostly for multitasking features. Threading on Darwin plain sucks

Yeah. Another one that doesn't understand that Mac OS X hasn't a Unix Kernel and took the Anandtech test for the truth.

Do your homework, the mach kernel doesn't use "fork" for creating a thread just as all unix systems, it only uses it to create a process.

" In Unix, the only way to create a new process is through the fork system call (or variant). In Mac OS X, tasks and threads are created and manipulated using Mach calls. Now, user programs typically do not deal with Mach tasks or threads directly. The Pthreads package in the system library creates Mach threads, but no user-space code typically creates Mach tasks."
http://www.kernelthread.com/mac/challenge/result/construction.html

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1