Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 24th Dec 2005 21:53 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems "It's finally arrived - the first Mac Mini clone. Our review system was supplied by Evesham, but the barebone chassis is manufactured by AOpen and has been known as the 'Pandora'. Sadly this catchy name is gone - AOpen has re-named it the Mini PC, which is just plain boring. Anyhow, name aside, this is a really cool-looking little machine - it arguably looks even better than the Mac Mini, mainly due to its aluminium case."
Thread beginning with comment 78307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: why?
by Duffman on Sun 25th Dec 2005 14:16 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: why?"
Duffman
Member since:
2005-11-23

>Because GNOME now gives you a better more intuitive GUI interface than you get with OSX ;-)

Funny.
I think you can keep it for an april's fool.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: why?
by chemical_scum on Sun 25th Dec 2005 19:02 in reply to "RE[3]: why?"
chemical_scum Member since:
2005-11-02

>Because GNOME now gives you a better more intuitive GUI interface than you get with OSX ;-)

Funny.
I think you can keep it for an april's fool.


A recent useability study at Birmingham Library in the UK showed that when a large sample of Library users were offered Win XP, KDE, GNOME and OSX desktops the majority found GNOME the most useable.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: why?
by Duffman on Sun 25th Dec 2005 19:50 in reply to "RE[4]: why?"
Duffman Member since:
2005-11-23

Yeah, there is ONE study on earth (no link ?) that said "some bunch of users found GNOME the most useable" and now you think that the majority of users on earth will find GNOME the most useable.

PS: What think Linus about that ? ... mwhahahahahahaha!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1