To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
10 year ago, discovering Solaris at the University, i understood what a real OS should be.
But is Solaris what a real OS should be?
Roughly 25 years ago, coming from an Apple DOS 3.3 and TRS-80 environment, I was introduced to CDC's KRONOS and NOS timesharing operating systems. In college I was introduced to Unisys' OS1100 and DEC's VMS.
There are so many things found in those mainframe and miniframe OSes (as well as in various IBM operating systems) that don't seem to be present at all in Solaris, and some of those things were (and still are) extremely useful for those who used or are still using those operating systems.
The computing world isn't just Unix and Windows, but it seems like many of the so-called "experts" today have defined it in just those terms.






Member since:
10 year ago, discovering Solaris at the University, i understood what a real OS should be. I downloaded Linux (0.99.x) and then I ran Linux at home. No more wfw3.11 crap or wfw3.11 in disguise (aka win95).
But now I don't care if it's linux or windows. Both are rock solid if h/w & drivers are. Coding GUI wxWidgets lets me not care. Or why not some Java? Batch programming? ACE. My main development is now in winXP and I have Cygwin.
Ok, ten+ years ago it did matter, but now? For embedded and RTOS it's a different story, agreed. But not for the desktop. imho.
/Meng