Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Dec 2005 15:34 UTC, submitted by oGALAXYo
"This document was created to show non-KDE people what they're missing - and if you haven't used KDE a lot, you're missing a lot of things and you may interested in reading this page to learn how many wonderful things you've been missing. I promise, this is a subjective analysis of why KDE rules. I was a GNOME user for a long time, one of those users who loved GNOME UI, and I didn't know how much things I was missing with KDE until I tried it."
Thread beginning with comment 79403
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2005-11-18
This whole ordeal is about personal preference. You use OS X, you are partial to that. I use Gnome, Windows and KDE occasionally. I think they all have good points. XP was a big step forward for Microsoft. I'm not saying their desktop environment is the be all and end all, nor is OS X, Gnome or KDE. Some people think that Fluxbox is the perfect desktop environment and for them it is, but not for you and that's okay.