Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Dec 2005 15:34 UTC, submitted by oGALAXYo
"This document was created to show non-KDE people what they're missing - and if you haven't used KDE a lot, you're missing a lot of things and you may interested in reading this page to learn how many wonderful things you've been missing. I promise, this is a subjective analysis of why KDE rules. I was a GNOME user for a long time, one of those users who loved GNOME UI, and I didn't know how much things I was missing with KDE until I tried it."
Thread beginning with comment 79517
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:> I am linux n00b incarnate.
For a n00b you write a lot of stuff that requires excessive througly deep Linux knowledge:
http://www.osnews.com/usercomments.php?uid=3737
Member since:2005-11-10
I write about what I know - windows and web design. Just because I can use windows, that doesn't mean I'm not a n00b on a new system. If you had never used RISC OS or Amiga OS before and I handed it to you, you wouldn't have a starting clue how to use it. Although that's harsh on RISC OS and Amiga because they're actually easy to use.
Trying to install a friggin app on Linux, or worse - a driver, was so hard to guess work, I couldn't do it; not even common sense and wild guessing would work :/
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-10
Up until recently, I had never used Linux before. I am linux n00b incarnate. Under good instruction I was told that Suse was an easy distribution.
Thanks to suse, I hate KDE with a passion. From a n00b standpoint it is an abomination of creature feapism. It's amazing that I even bothered to try Ubuntu later on after being totally turned off of Linux.
Ubuntu isn't anal retentive, but at the same time it doesn't really offer all that much more than I have and am comfortable with, with WindowsXP.