Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Dec 2005 15:34 UTC, submitted by oGALAXYo
"This document was created to show non-KDE people what they're missing - and if you haven't used KDE a lot, you're missing a lot of things and you may interested in reading this page to learn how many wonderful things you've been missing. I promise, this is a subjective analysis of why KDE rules. I was a GNOME user for a long time, one of those users who loved GNOME UI, and I didn't know how much things I was missing with KDE until I tried it."
Thread beginning with comment 79662
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
And the idiots don't even bother to read and/or understand the article. It's a presentation of the things that are possible in KDE just because of its architecture. Things which, of course, neither GNOME, nor CDE, nor XFCE nor Windows nor OSX do.
But no, every dumbhead must give their opinion why 'KDE is not [necessarily] better'. THAT'S NOT WHAT THE ARTICLE'S ABOUT, DDUUHH!
--bleyz