To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"This is trully slackware + pacman, but its called netpkg. It has less options, like no removing [that i know of], but you got pkgtool"
NETpkg = Network Package Manager != Pacman
Netpkg also has more options in its field, do "man netpkg"
"Zenwalk does all the steps for you that are usually done [by me] + one more."
You shouldn't compare 1 year of development/improvements done by several people, with post-installation tunnings. This is not fair for Zenwalk developpers
Zenwalk is now as far from Slackware as Ubuntu is from Debian.
JP
well I didn't really mean this to discredit the developers. It's just that Zenwalk is at the stage where I wish Slackware was on the desktop. Zenwalk meets my needs perfectly. It does what I do on slackware afterward/before and even things I wish I could do.
Also, netpkg reminds me of pacman. And I did read man netpkg and know there are more options than "netpkg foo"
I like the way netpkg is simple and meets all dependancies.




Member since:
2005-07-06
maybe slackware should aquire netpkg. it seems to do a really good job. I installed this and I would describe it as installing slackware + optional tweaks I usually do. What it reminds me of is archlinux. This is trully slackware + pacman, but its called netpkg. It has less options, like no removing [that i know of], but you got pkgtool, which is really good.
I usually install the 2.6.13 kernel [test26] and from there I install the modules and such.
Zenwalk does all the steps for you that are usually done [by me] + one more. I wish Slackware would only install the programs you need then add x11 and fluxbox afterwards.
I am excited for this as well:
Quote:
But I plan to release another branch more optimized for servers : Zenwalk Lamp :
- smaller
- with non-preemptive kernel
- with essential LAMP features (Apache, Mysql, PHP)
Can't wait, guys there are doing a GREAT!!! Job.