To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm just as pissed at Intel, Sony, ATI and all the other big names who are all signed up and ready implement this.
Microsoft can't provide end to end protected path; they have hardware guys like Intel below their spot in the stack providing the TPM modules, and hardware guys like Sony above them leading the charge for HDMI interfaces.
It's a big DRM gang bang and Microsoft is somewhere in the middle. Bill has much less to gain than the media companies who seem to have him on a leash. Hell hes' got things to lose. The compatibility of his OS and the user friendlyness is serious hampered by the DRM and protected path craze. I suppose the only reason hes not fighting it is... what makes the world go round... money, from the likes of the RIAA and Sony directly. I doubt he's doing it for any indirect benefits he would get by supporting DRM/PVP.
Bill has much less to gain than the media companies who seem to have him on a leash.
Actually Redmond have quite a lot to gain. They have seen a chance to force/lure the industry to accept protection against the pirate mob, in exchange of exclusively using Redmond multimedia standards. Most Video/Audio will thus be tied to the Windows platform.
If they in addition succeeds with replacing PDF and flash with their own closed alternatives - then they got it all.




Member since:
2005-12-28
A future where you are forced to run Vista if you want to do anything remotely multimedia related.