Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Jan 2006 16:38 UTC, submitted by Federico Pistono
Thread beginning with comment 80780
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-01-02
Actually I wanted to contact you about this point. It is indeed true that it resembles your article. The structure is so similar that it seems like a 1:1 verbatim copy.
This is because I initially searched a lot throughout the internet and man pages to create it, and I also got into your good article.
However, I started to write one for myself, but having in mind your clear and simple structure I could not do anything but to follow it, even unconsciously. I DID realise that it was VERY similar to yours, but I figured that there weren't so many ways of putting it, even trying very hard. Probably if I hadn't read yours, I would have produced a similar result anyways, since I think you would agree with me that the complexity of the topic is pretty low.
So what I did is I rewrote the article with your structure in mind, but modifying all the parts I felt needed to be inserted, and omitting the others.
If you REALLY feel like you deserve a direct link quoting the "source" I think it's fair enough, just tell me and I will add a line quoting your work. I certainly do not intent to commit plagarism, I just did not think it was necessary given the situation.
I hope this solves the problem, if you have to feel any way you should feel flattered, if from all the pages I read I had in mind yours there should be a reason. ^__^
Peace.
Federico Pistono.