Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jan 2006 14:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 81217
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jan 2006 17:11
in reply to "RE[7]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep"
RE[8]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep
by dylansmrjones on Tue 3rd Jan 2006 18:22
in reply to "RE[7]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep"
RE[8]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep
by AmigaRobbo on Tue 3rd Jan 2006 18:48
in reply to "RE[7]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep"
RE[9]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep
by Don Grayson on Wed 4th Jan 2006 02:23
in reply to "RE[8]: IE is fine for me, doesn't need feature-creep"
I come here to read text, ie what people have written, not to see advanced use of CSS
Advanced use of CSS isn't something that you are supposed to see to begin with. That's the point. While CSS can add some flash to a site, it's basic premise is to make your site viewable across any platform.
For instance, you can write a simple web page and then, by use of a CSS sheet, create a clean version of the page for printing, offer a large text version of the seeing impaired or a parred down version for RSS or Cell phones. All without actually altering your website's structural code or writing 7 different versions of the same page. CSS is good for the developer and the user.





.
Member since:
2005-12-21
OSNews might work on every browser but it uses outdated table layouts and cautiously avoids any advanced use of CSS, not to mention the ugly use of document.write here and there. So yes it works, but it's far from being optimal and not the best example of a well written site I would give (my apologies to Thom, coping with the current browser market is a fine art).