Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jan 2006 12:45 UTC
Windows "Microsoft set out to adopt a formal and rigid support lifecycle in 2002, back at a time when most analysts were expecting to see Windows Vista within a couple of years. My own point of view was that this lifecycle business had a lot to do with Microsoft's then-new volume licensing scheme, which among other things is oriented towards selling software subscriptions. If you're buying a subscription for software, you can see how lifecycle plans become important. However, delays in Windows Vista coupled with a questionable approach to 'consumer' products means that 2007 will carry a few surprises unless policy changes are made at Redmond."
Thread beginning with comment 81554
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE
by Kroc on Wed 4th Jan 2006 14:19 UTC
Kroc
Member since:
2005-11-10

Amazing to think that two bytes (and £100) makes the difference between support being dropped very premature and not (XP PRO)

It's amazing the world puts up with it at all :/

RE
by Celerate on Wed 4th Jan 2006 17:27 in reply to "RE"
Celerate Member since:
2005-06-29

Would changing those two bits then extend the lifespan of Windows XP home by making it pro, or can Windows Update tell the difference?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE
by ma_d on Wed 4th Jan 2006 18:15 in reply to "RE"
ma_d Member since:
2005-06-29

I believe it can by the product key. However, he makes a valid point that supporting XP Home is essentially free if you're already supporting XP Pro. You need one more test machine.
I imagine they'll give a one year stay of execution closer to the line after they've scared a few people into considering an immediate upgrade to Vista upon release.

This wouldn't be such a big deal if it weren't for the general lack of security of the system (make whatever excuse you want for it, it's not a safe system to operate for a year without updates).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1