Linked by Alcibiades on Wed 4th Jan 2006 18:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 81666
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There is no chance for windows to be secure, and not in the future with their vista. There is basically little changes in security with vista. Even the company admits that you will need a firewall, antivirus, antispyware to be more protected online. I tried vista 5270 and went to some malacious sites intensionally and got vista gone wild. Windows will never be rewitten to be more secure, thats what happened since it was designed since VMS.
Your only chance is to by Mac OSX ( if you have money ) or download and install a linux OS ( if you don't have money ).
Windows disadvantages does not lie in security alone. But it is a slow performer especially when you install 10 applications and more. on 10,000 rpm drive with 4.2 ms seek time windows xp +SP2 starts up in about 4 minutes (CPU 3GHz, RAM 1 GB), and if you check why then you will discover that vital services that I run to protect windows are causing it+ some faulty drivers of top manufacturers in sound (creative) and chipsets (intel), this is never seen on linux on the same machine with the same amount of software installed; my current os is RHEL4.2 which beats windows xp sp2 hands down. The only problem with linux will be that you will learn from scratch to deal with it, but I guess it will pay off.