Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jan 2006 17:59 UTC
"With Opera recently releasing their web browser completely free of Ads, it is a good time to let the truth be told. Not only is Opera faster then Firefox in all performance areas, it is much more secure and more compliant."
Thread beginning with comment 81942
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: It's also more ....
by renox on Thu 5th Jan 2006 15:54
in reply to "RE[2]: It's also more ...."
Member since:2005-07-06
Depends: if the HTML pages includes images, Firefox tends to increase memory and never free it which makes it slower over the time which is annoying..
Also annoying is that it tend to get very slow if it hits the 300 MB+ memory usage even on a box which has 1 GB of RAM: Firefox memory usage suck but Windows XP memory handling suck too.
There is no reason why a 300MB app should be slow on a PC with 1GB of RAM..
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-13
The long wait for Firefox to start once you've double-clicked a HTML document is a real nightmare for someone that opens scores of local HTML documents in his/her everyday work.
Someone that opens scores of local HTML documents in his/her everyday work don't close the browser. That way is faster even if the browser is the fastest loading.