Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Jan 2006 18:05 UTC, submitted by BSD_User
PC-BSD "PBIs have the advantage of being entirely self-contained. That means casual users won't inadvertently overwrite existing libraries or files by installing and uninstalling applications. This article shows how to create your own PBI, using Digikam as an example of a rather complex package with many library dependencies. While most PBIs will be easier to generate, I want to demonstrate most of the gotchas you may run across when generating your own PBIs." In addition, here is an article explaining how to get MS Office running via WINE on FreeBSD.
Thread beginning with comment 82938
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Pretty cool
by molnarcs on Sat 7th Jan 2006 23:23 UTC in reply to "Pretty cool"
molnarcs
Member since:
2005-09-10

How is ooo.org built for pc-bsd? I recently switched to ooo-build (2.0.1) which built with the following in pkgtools.conf:
'editors/ooo-build' => '-DWITH_KDE WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED=1 WITH_MMX=1 -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA WITH_ICONS=KDE',

It looks polished and it integrates very well into KDE desktop (crystal icons, desktop themes). Screenshot:
ftp://hatvani.unideb.hu/pub/personal/screenshots/ooo-build.png

I put up the packages for a friend of mine here, but I'm not sure if they are useful for everyone, because they are athlon-xp optimized (ooo-build itself I think disregards make.conf settings, but the dependencies don't). The directory contains all the dependencies of ooo-build as well (created with pkg_create -R -b ooo-build).
ftp://hatvani.unideb.hu/pub/FreeBSD/athlon_xp_packages/openoffice/

I was always an admirer of pc-bsd and desktkopbsd as well. I think the two projects are not in direct competition, for DesktopBSD seems to be basically FreeBSD with a nice skin and easy installation. It aims at removing the first barrier from installing FreeBSD, but uses ports and default FreeBSD tools. PC-BSD on the other hand aims and desktop users who don't want to dig deeper into the system.

Anyway, I'm quite comfortable with FreeBSD - but I'm not the target audience, I understand that. I have a spare partition for OS review purposes (currently inhabited by Kubuntu) - I may try it out someday ;)

Seeing how KDE centric the project is (which is a good thing IMHO) I was wondering about a tighter cooperation between the KDE project and PC-BSD, afterall, PC-BSD is a good choice for showing off KDE and it's portability, the fact that it runs very well on other unix systems besides Linux. Any thought on that? It might help porting efforts - right now kde@freebsd seems to be a one man show (Michael Nottebrock), but correct me if I'm wrong.

Reply Parent Score: 3