Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jan 2006 15:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 84061
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You can "require" dual cores because a single-core processor will not be able to provide sufficient performance at some point in the future. Even if you have a 3.0 GHz Athlon 64, and the game requires ~5.0 GHz of processing power (it will happen, not soon, but it will), no single-core CPU will be capable of it, thus in essence saying "you need dual cores".
Single-core performance has more or less peaked for the forseeable future. That's why there's such a push for dual cores and multithreading now.
As for dual-processor systems ... yeah, but dual-processor is a lot more expensive than dual-core. Consumers will all be on dual-core sooner or later.




Member since:
2005-07-06
How can you "require" dual cores? It's not like it's impossible to run multiple threads on the same CPU. Sure it won't be true concurrency, but it'll still operate.
Also, let's assume the game needs two threads to run in true concurrency. These threads will be able to run well on dual processor systems too.