Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jan 2006 18:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 84110
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Ooh, and the Megahertz Myth is back!
by TomB7 on Tue 10th Jan 2006 21:48
in reply to "RE[2]: Ooh, and the Megahertz Myth is back!"
RE[4]: Ooh, and the Megahertz Myth is back!
by PlatformAgnostic on Wed 11th Jan 2006 01:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Ooh, and the Megahertz Myth is back!"
Doubtful... Windows will do better on multiproc machines than Mac OS X because it has finer-grained locking and is fully preemptible, which Mac OS is not. Until relatively recently, OS X was governed by a rather small number of large locks: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2028.html#MacOSXKernelThr...
OS X might have some advantages over Vista, but it's Kernel is not likely to be one of them. NT is pretty hard to beat.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Yes. And so tecno-babble about PPC superiority goes to hell finally. Now it's time to benchmark on market standards. I cannot wait to see :
a) It Windowz can be installed on it and run
b) Linux should work out of the box, but kernel guys will keep up shortly
c) a three boot system, to benchmark